Document Type : Research Note
Author
Department of Civil Engineering, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran.
Abstract
Building insulation stands out as one of the most widely employed strategies to enhance energy efficiency in the building sector. Increasing the thickness of thermal insulation is a conventional approach to meet the design requirements of these structures. In this study, a novel approach to augment the thermal resistance of external building walls is explored by simultaneously employing multiple thermal insulation materials, comparing this with a single-layer insulation setup. Three typical insulation materials with varying thicknesses are utilized to create a three-layer insulation system, which is applied to a case study involving a house-like cubicle situated in the 3B climate zone per ASHRAE 169-2006. The findings indicate that merely increasing the thickness of a single-layer insulation does not invariably yield optimal solutions. A comparison of two non-dominated solutions, both with a thickness of 15 cm, reveals that both alternatives achieve approximately 70 percent energy savings compared to the base model lacking wall insulation. Furthermore, the environmental impact of the three-layer solution is 45%, and its cost is 43% lower than that of the single-layer solution. In summary, multi-layer thermal insulation emerges as an effective and environmentally friendly method. The results emphasize that the consideration of multi-layer insulation systems can establish a continuous decision-making space, enabling the identification of at least one insulation scenario aligned with design requirements. To facilitate designers in the initial stages of thermal insulation design, a rapid and simplified design model has been developed based on the results. The methodology proposed in this study is generalizable and can be applied to all climate zones, offering a comprehensive design tool without the need for intricate calculations.
Keywords
- Multi-Layer Insulation Systems
- Building Energy Efficiency
- Three-Dimensional System
- Decision-Making Space
- Thermal Insulation Systems
- Building Envelope
Main Subjects
- Açıkkalp, E., & Kandemir, S.Y. (2019). A Method for determining optimum insulation thickness: combined economic and environmental method. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 11, 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2019.04.004
- Amani, N., & Kiaee, E. (2020). Developing a two-criteria framework to rank thermal insulation materials in nearly zero energy buildings using multi-objective optimization approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122592
- Amani, N., & Reza Soroush, A.A. (2020). Effective energy consumption parameters in residential buildings using Building Information Modeling. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(4), 467-480. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2020.04.04
- Amiri Rad, E., & Fallahi, E. (2019). Optimizing the insulation thickness of external wall by a novel 3E (energy, environmental, economic) method. Construction and Building Materials, 205, 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.006
- Annibaldi, V., Cucchiella, F., Berardinis, P.D., Rotilio, M., & Stornelli, V. (2019). Environmental and economic benefits of optimal insulation thickness: A life-cycle cost analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116, 109441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109441
- Arregi, B., Garay, R., Astudillo, J., Garcia, M., & Ramos, J.C. (2020). Experimental and numerical thermal performance assessment of a multi -layer building envelope component made of biocomposite materials. Energy and Buildings, 214, 109846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109846
- Aydin, N., & Biyikoğlu, A. (2020). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness by Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Residential Buildings in Turkey. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 27, 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2020.1776066
- Azari, A., Garshasbi, S., Amini, P., Rashed-Ali, H., & Mohammadi, Y. (2016). Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance. Energy and Buildings, 126, 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.054
- Cabeza, L.F., Castell, A., Medrano, M., Martorell, I., Pe´rez, G., & Ferna´ndez, I. (2010). Experimental study on the performance of insulation materials in Mediterranean construction. Energy and Buildings, 42, 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.10.033
- Canbolat, A.S., Bademlioglu, A.H., Saka, k., & Kaynakli, O. (2020). Investigation of parameters affecting the optimum thermal insulation thickness for building in hot and cold climates. Thermal Science, 24(5): 2891-2903. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI181105068C
- Carreras, J., Boer, D., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Cabeza, L.F., Medrano, M. & Jiménez, L. (2015). Multi-objective optimization of thermal modelled cubicles considering the total cost and life cycle environmental impact. Energy and Buildings, 88, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.007
- Climate Zone 3B. (2021). Open Energy Information. Available at: https://openei.org/wiki/Climate_Zone_3B.
- Coma, J., Pérez, G., de Gracia, A., Burés, S., Urrestarazu, M., & Cabeza, L.F. (2017). Vertical greenery systems for energy savings in buildings: A comparative study between green walls and green facades. Building and Environment, 111, 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.014
- Comaklı, K., & Yuksel, B. (2003). Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23, 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00209-0
- (2018). DesignBuilder EnergyPlus Simulation Documentation for DesignBuilder v5. Available at: https://designbuilder.co.uk/download/documents/25-designbuilder-printable-documentation-v4-a4-pages/file. 2018.
- Dombayci, O.A., Ulu, E.Y., Guven, S., Atalay, O., & Ozturk, H.K. (2020). Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building external walls with different insulation materials using environmental impact assessment. Thermal Science, 24 (1), 303-311. http://doi:10.2298/TSCI180903010D
- Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2010). A new evolutionary strategy for Pareto Multi-Objective Optimization. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 99. http://doi:10.4203/ccp.94.99
- (2014). Energy Simulation Software. Available at: www.apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/
- Gonzalo, M.B., & Bovea, M.D. (2017). Environmental and cost performance of building envelope insulation materials to reduce energy demand: thickness optimization. Energy and Buildings, 150, 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.005
- Gounni, A., Mabrouk, M.T., Kheiri, A., & El Alami, M. (2020). Impact of insulation thicknesses of several types of thermal insulator on energy cost with respect to different climate zones in Morocco. International Conference on Materials & Energy (ICOME’17 and ICOME’18), 307, 01023. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202030701023
- Hasan, A. (1999). Optimizing insulation thickness for buildings using life cycle cost. Applied Energy, 63, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00023-9
- Liu, X., Chen, X., & Shahrestani, M. (2020). optimization of insulation thickness of external walls of residential buildings in hot summer and cold winter zone of China. Sustainability, 12(4), 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041574.
- Kayfeci, M., Keçebas, A., & Gedik, E., (2013). Determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls with two different methods in cooling applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 50 (1), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.06.031
- Kaynakli, O. (2008). A study on residential heating energy requirement and optimum insulation thickness. Renewable Energy, 33, 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.07.001
- Kumar, D., Zou, P., Memon, R., Alam, M.D., Sanjayan, J., & Kumar, S. (2019). Life-cycle cost analysis of building wall and insulation materials. Journal of Building Physics, 43 (5), 428-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744259119857749
- Mahlia, T.M.I., Taufiq, B.N., Ismail, I., & Masjuki, H.H. (2007). Correlation between thermal conductivity and the thickness of selected insulation materials for building wall. Energy and Buildings, 39 (2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.06.002
- Menoufi, K., Castell, A., Farid, M.M., Boer, D., & Cabeza, L.F. (2013). Life Cycle assessment of experimental cubicles including PCM manufactured from natural resources (esters): A theoretical study. Renewable Energy, 51, 398- 403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.010
- Nematchoua, M.K., Raminosoa, C.R.R., Mamiharijaona, R., René, T., Orosa, J.A., Elvis, W., & Meukam, P. (2015). Study of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for buildings in a wet and hot tropical climate: Case of Cameroon. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1192-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.066
- Ozel, M. (2012). Cost analysis for optimum thicknesses and environmental impacts of different insulation materials. Energy and Buildings, 49, 552-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.002
- Rosti, B., Omidvar, A., & Monghasemi, N. (2020). Optimal insulation thickness of common classic and modern exterior walls in different climate zones of Iran. Journal of Building Engineering, 27, 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100954
- Sharif, S..A., & Hammad, A. (2019). Simulation-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of institutional building renovation considering energy consumption, Life-Cycle Cost and Life-Cycle Assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.006
- (2020). Evaluate the environmental performance of products and services in general at the material, component, and system levels, and include applications to the building industry. Available at: https://simapro.com/
- Sirisalee, P., Parks, G., Clarkson, T.P.G., & Ashby, M.F. (2003). A new approach to multi-criteria material selection in engineering design. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED, Stockholm, August 19-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200300554
- Stazi, F., Vegliò, A., Perna, C.D., & Munafò, P. (2013). Experimental comparison between 3 different traditional wall constructions and dynamic simulations to identify optimal thermal insulation strategies. Energy and Buildings, 60, 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.032
- Zhua, P., Huckemann, V., Fisch, V.N. (2011). The optimum thickness and energy saving potential of external wall insulation in different climate zones of China. Procedia Engineering, 21, 608-616. http://doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2056
)