1. Sarangi, G.K. and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., "Rooftop solar development in India: Measuring policies and mapping business models", Asian Development Bank Institute, (2021). (https://www.adb.org/publications/rooftop-solar-development-india-policies-mapping-business-models).
2. Parsad, C., Mittal, S. and Krishnankutty, R., "A study on the factors affecting household solar adoption in Kerala, India", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, (2020), 1695-1720. (https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2019-0544).
3. Bridge to India, "India solar rooftop map 2020", (21 September 2021). (https://bridgetoindia.com/report/india-solar-rooftop-map-december-2020/).
4. Bhati, P., Sreenivasan, P., Singh, M., Koshy, S.M., Jhawar, P. and Sambyal, S., "The state of renewable energy in India 2019 - A citizen's report", Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, (2019). (https://shaktifoundation.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/State-of-Renewable-Energy-in-India.pdf).
5. Parag, Y. and Sovacool, B.K., "Electricity market design for the prosumer era", Nature Energy, (2016). (https://doi.org/10.1038/NENERGY.2016.32).
6. Jeyapaul, P.P., “A mathematical approach to analyze factors influencing adoption of solar based power production in residential buildings in tamilnadu state of India”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, (2020), 537-548.

(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Praveen-Jeyapaul/publication/357793707_A_Mathematical_Approach_to_Analyze_Factors_Influencing_Adoption_of_Solar_Based_Power_Production_in_Residential_Buildings_in_Tamilnadu_State_of_India/links/61dfcffc034dda1b9ef3506d/A-Mathematical-Approach-to-Analyze-Factors-Influencing-Adoption-of-Solar-Based-Power-Production-in-Residential-Buildings-in-Tamilnadu-State-of-India.pdf).

7. Quraishi, K.S. and Ahmed, S., “Analysis of purchase behaviour of residential solar rooftop pv adopters”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 10, No. 5, (2019), pp. 28-37,. (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3508704).
8. Sauthoff, S., Danne, M. and Mußhoff, O., “To switch or not to switch? Understanding German consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes”, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung (DARE), Göttingen, Diskussionsbeitrag No. 1707, (2017). (https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/161433).
9. Chassot, S., Wüstenhagen, R., Fahr, N. and Graf, P., “Introducing green electricity as the default option”, Marketing Renewable Energy - Concepts, Business Models and Cases, (2017), 109-122.

 ( https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46427-5_6)

10. Meran, G. and Schwarze, R., “A theory of optimal green defaults”, Sustainibility, Vol. 10, No. 8, (2018). ( https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082902).
11. Ebeling, F. and Lotz, S., “Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs”, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, No. 9, (2015), 868-871. (https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nclimate2681)
12. Bridge to India, “India Corporate Renewable Brief,” Bridge to India, (2021). (https://india-re-navigator.com/public/uploads/1628144382-BRIDGE-TO-INDIA-India-Corporate-Renewable-Brief.pdf)
13. M. E. R. Commission, “Green power tariff order,” MERC, Mumbai, (2021).
14. Defeuilley, C., "Retail competition in electricity markets", Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 2, (2009), 377-386. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.025).
15. Pichert, D. and Katsikopoulos, K.V., “Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, (2008), 63 - 73.. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004).
16. Litvine, D. and Wüstenhagen, R. , “Helping "light green" consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the swiss electricity market”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, No. 3, (2011), 462-474. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.005).
17. Koto, P. S. and Yiridoe, E. K., “Expected willingness to pay for wind energy in Atlantic Canada”, Energy Policy, Vol, 129, (2019), 80 - 88. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.009).
18. Xie, B.C. and Zhao, W., “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent valuation method,” Energy Policy, Vol. 114, (2018), 98 - 107. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.067).
19. Schubert, R., Schmitz, J., Grieder, M.  and Ghesla, C., “Green by Default - Welfare Effects of Green Default Electricity Contracts: Final report” ETH Zurich Research Collection, Zurich, (2017). (https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000230116)
20. Prayas, A.C., "Residential electricity consumption in India: what do we know", Prayas, Energy Group, Pune, (2016). https://energy.prayaspune.org/our-work/research-report/residential-electricity-consumption-in-india-what-do-we-know
21. Authority, C. E., “Report on Nineteenth Electric Power Suvey of India” Ministry of Power, New Delhi, (2020). https://cea.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/summary_19th_eps.pdf
22. Webster, J. and Watson, R. T. “Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, (2002), 13-23. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319).
23. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Bürer, M.J.,  “Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept,” Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 5, (2007), 2863-2691. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001).
24. Yoo, S.H. and Kwak, S.Y., “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingen valuation study”, Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 12, (2009), 5408–5416, (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.062).
25. Kwak, S.Y. and Yoo, S.H., "The public’s value for developing ocean energy technology in the Republic of Korea: A contingent valuation study", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 43, (2015), 432-439. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.036).
26. Lee, C.Y., Lee, M.K. and Yoo, S.H., "Willingness to pay for replacing traditional energies with renewable energy in South Korea", Energy,  Vol. 128, (2017), 284-290. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.037).
27. Nakano, R., Miwa, T. and Morikawa, T., “Comparative Analysis on Citizen’s Subjective Responses Related to Their Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy in Japan Using Latent Variables”, Sustainibility, Vol. 10, No. 7, (2018), 1-14. (https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072423).
28. Goett, A.A., Hudson, K. and Train, K.E., “Customers' Choice Among Retail Energy Suppliers: The Willingness-to-Pay for Service Attributes” The Energy Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, (2000) 1-28. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/41322898).
29. Borchers, A.M., Duke, J.M. and Parsons, G.R.,  “Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?”, Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 6, (2007), 3327- 3334. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009).
30. Cicia, G., Cembalo, L., Del Giudice, T. and Palladino, A., “Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey”, Energy Policy, Vol. 42, (2009), 59-66. ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.030).
31. Yang, Y., Solgaard, H.S. and Haider, W., “Value seeking, price sensitive, or green? Analyzing preference heterogeneity among residential energy consumers in Denmark”, Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 6, (2015), 15-28. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.001).
32. Shin, K.J. and Managi, S., “Liberalization of a retail electricity market: Consumer satisfaction and household switching behavior in Japan,” Energy Policy, Vol. 110, (2017), 675 - 685,. (http:/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.048)
33. Yang, Y., “Understanding household switching behavior in the retail electricity market”, Energy Policy, Vol. 69, (2014), 406 - 414,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.009).
34. Ndebele, T., Marsh, D. and Scarpa, R., “Consumer switching in retail electricity markets: Is price all that matters?,” Energy Economics, Vol. 83, (2019), 88 - 103. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.012).
35. Nkansah, K. and Collins, A.R., “Willingness to Pay for Wind versus Natural Gas Generation of Electricity”, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, (2019), 44 - 70. (https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.40).
36. Koto, P. S. and Yiridoe, E. K. “Expected willingness to pay for wind energy in Atlantic Canada”, Energy Policy, (2019), 80 - 88. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.009).
37. Rommel, J., Sagebiel, J. and Müller, J.R.,  “Quality uncertainty and the market for renewable energy: Evidence from German Consumers”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 94, (2016), 106-113. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.049).
38. Sagebiel, J., Müller, J.R. and Rommel, J., “Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online choice experiment in Germany”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 2, (2014), 90 -101. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.003)
39. Kalkbrenner, B.J., Yonezawa, K. and Roosen, J., “Consumer preferences for electricity tariffs: Does proximity matter?”,  Energy Policy, Vol. 107, (2017), 413-424. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.009).
40. Ghesla, C., Grieder, M. and Schubert, R., “Nudging the poor and the rich – A field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults”, Energy Economics, Vol. 86, (2020), 104616. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616).
41. M. o. S. a. P. Implementation, “India in Figures”, Central Statistical Organisation, Delhi, (2018). (http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/India_in_figures-2018_rev.pdf.)
42. Entele, B. R. , “Analysis of households' willingness to pay for a renewable source of electricity service connection: evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice survey in rural Ethiopia”, Heliyon, Vol. 6, NO. 2, (2020), 03332. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03332)
43. Ugulu, A. I. andAigbavboa,  C., “Assessing urban households’ Willingness to Pay for Standalone Solar Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study of Lagos, Nigeria,” Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, (2019),  553 - 566. (https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0274).
44. Ayodele, T.R., Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O., Ajayi, O.D., Yusuff, A.A. and Mosetlhe, T.C., “Willingness to pay for green electricity derived from renewable energy sources in Nigeria”,  Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 148, (2021), 111279. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111279)
45. Nduka, E., “How to get rural households out of energy poverty in Nigeria: A contingent valuation study”,  Energy Policy, Vol. 149, (2021), 112072,. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112072).
46. Oluoch, S., Lal, P., Susaeta, A. and Wolde, B.,  “Public preferences for renewable energy options: A choice experiment in Kenya”. Energy Economics, Vol. 98, (2021), 105256. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105256)
47. Numata, M., Sugiyama, M., Swe, W. and del Barrio Alvarez, D., “Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Energy Source Preference”, Energies, Vol. 45, No. 4, (2021), 1505. (https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051505)
48. Krishnan, D.S., Thanikonda, A.K., Kumar, P. and Mandal, T., “How electricity distribution companies in India can work with commercial and industrial consumers for renewable energy procurement”. Delhi, (2020). (https://wri-india.org/sites/default/files/uploads/how-electricity-distribution-companies-india-can-work-commercial-industrial-consumers-renewable-energy-procurement.pdf)
49. Mandal, T., Sen, V. and Anirudh, S., “Renewable Energy Procurement Perceptions among Commercial and Industrial Consumers: Current Practices and Future Possibilities”, World Resources Institute, (2022). (https://www.wri.org/research/renewable-energy-procurement-perceptions-among-commercial-and-industrial-consumers)
50. Lahiri, D. and Acharjee, G., “Biomass gasifier electricity and study of willingness to pay”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Resources, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2013), 16-18. (file:///C:/Users/m.fouladian/Downloads/download.pdf).

51. Dossani, R. and Ranganathan,  V. , “Farmers willingness to pay for power in India: Conceptual Issues, Survey results and implication for pricing”. Energy Economics, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2004), 359 - 369. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.eneco.2004.04.004).
52. Urpelainen, J. and Yoon, S. , “Solar home systems for rural India: Survey evidence on awareness and willingness to pay from Uttar Pradesh”, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 24, (2015), 70 - 78­­­­. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.10.005).
53. Gunatilake, H., Patail, S. and Yang, J. C., “Valuing Electricity Service Attributes: A Choice Experiment Study in Madhya Pradesh, India”,  Asian Development Bank, Phillipines, (2012). (http://hdl.handle.net/10419/109432).
54. Gill, B., Saluja, S. and Palit, D., “Charging Power: UnderstandingElectricity Pricing and Willingness to Pay for Electricity in India,” Delhi, (2017). (https://www.teriin.org/sites/default/files/2019-03/Charging%20Power_Policy%20Note_270217-FINAL.pdf).
55. Bridge To India, “India Corporate Renewable Energy Brief,” Bridge to India, (2021). (https://wwfin.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/india_corporate_renewable_brief__q3__2021.pdf)
56. Buckley, P. , “Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: A meta analysis”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 172, (2020), 106635. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106635).
57. Abdullah, S. and Jeanty, P.W., “Willingness to pay for renewable energy:Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 6, (2011), 2974 - 2983. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.016).
58. Kim, J., Park, J., Kim, H. and Heo, E., “Assessment of Korean customers’ willingness to pay with RPS”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 1, (2012), 695-703. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.034).
59. Andor, M.A., Frondel, M. and Vance, C., “Germany’s Energiewende: A Tale of Increasing Costs and Decreasing Willingness to Pay”, ECONSTOR, Vol. 645, (2017). (http://dx.doi.org/10.4419/86788750).
60. Hanemann, M., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation”,  American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73, No. 4,  (1991),  1255-1263. (https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453).
61. Whittington, D., “Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries”, World Development, Vol. 26, No. 1, (1998), 21-30. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00125-3).
62. Bigerna, S. and Polinori, P., “Italian households' willingness to pay for green electricity”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 34, (2014), 110-121. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.002).
63. Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G., Chalikias, M., Arabatzis, G. and Skordoulis, M., “Public Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Case Study from Greece,” Sustainibility, Vol. 10, No. 3, (2018). (https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030687).
64. Hobman, E. V. and Frederiks, E. R., “Barriers to green electricity subscription in Australia: “Love the environment, love renewable energy, but why should I pay more?” , Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 3, (2014), 78 - 88,. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.009).
65. Li, H., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., Berrens, R. P., and Herron, K. G., “Public support for reducing US reliance on fossil fuels: Investigating household willingness-to-pay for energy research and development”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 3, (2009), 731 - 742. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.005).
66. Sun, C., Ouyang, X., and Meng, X., “Public acceptance towards waste-to-energy power plants: a new quantified assessment based on "willingness to pay", Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 62, No. 14, (2019). (https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1560930).
67. Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J. and Moore, M. R., “Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior:Participation in a green electricity program”,  Journal of Environmental Pyschology, Vol. 23, No. 3, (2003),  237 - 246. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00105-6).
68. Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A. and Garling, T., “Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity”, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 2, (2008), 768-774. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.027).
69. Ozaki, R., “Adopting Sustainable Innovation: What Makes Consumers Sign up to Green Electricity?”,  Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 20, No. 1, (2011), 1 - 17. (https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.650).
70. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. “Valuing public goods:The purchase of moral satisfaction”,  Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, (1992), 57 - 70. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S).
71. Guagnano, G. A. , “Altruism and market-like behavior: An analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products,” Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 22, (2001), 425 - 438. (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006753823611).
72. Araña, J.E. and León, C.J., “Willingness to pay for health risk reduction in the context of altruism”, Health Economics, Vol. 11, No.7, (2002), 623-635. (10.1002/hec.687).
73. Onwujekwe, O., Chima, R., Shu, E., Nwagbo, D., Akpala, C. and Okonkwo, P., “Altruistic willingness to pay in community-based sales of insecticide-treated nets exists in Nigeria,” Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 54, No.4, (2002), 519 - 527. (doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)000).
74. Ojea, E. and Loureiro, M. , “Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay for wildlife”, Ecological Economics, Volume 63,  No. 4, (2007), 807-814. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.003).
75. Umberger, W.J., Thilmany McFadden, D.D. and Smith, A.R., “Does Altruism Play a Role in Determining U.S.Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Natural and Regionally Produced Beef?”, Agribusiness: An International Journal,Vol. 25, No. 2, (2009), 268-285. (10.1002/agr.20194).
76. Herbes, C., Friege, C., Baldo, D. and Mueller, K.M. “Willingness to paylip service? Applying a neuroscience-based method to WTP for green electricity”, Energy Policy, Vol. 87, (2015), 562-572. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.001).
77. Hansla, A. , “Value orientation and framing as determinants of stated willingness to pay for eco-labeled electricity”, Energy Efficiency, Vol. 4, (2010), 185 - 192. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-010-9096-0).
78. Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J. and Brown, T. C., A Primer on Nonmarket aluation, Springer, (2017). (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6).
79. Boyle, K. J., Bishop, R. C. and Welsh, M. P. “Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games”, Land Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2, (1985), 188 - 194. (https://doi.org/10.2307/3145811).
80. Chunekar, A., Varshney, S. and Dixit, S., “Residential electricity consumption in India,” Prayas Energy Group, Pune, (2016). (https://energy.prayaspune.org/our-work/research-report/residential-electricity-consumption-in-india-what-do-we-know).
81. Loomis, J. ,“Whats to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies,” Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 25, No. 2, (2011) 363-370. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00675.x).
82. Özdemir, S., Johnson, F. R. and Hauber, A. B. , “Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, (2009), 894–901. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.04.004).
83. Ethier, R. G., Poe, G. L., Schulze, W. D. and Clark, J., “A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs”, Land Economics, (2000), pp. 54 - 67. (https://doi.org/10.2307/3147257).
84. Carson, R. T., “Contingent Valuation: A User’s Guide”, Environmental Science and Technology, (2000), 1413 - 1418. (https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/7245/files/wp970025.pdf).
85. Whittington, D., “Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 22, (2002), 323-367. (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015575517927).
86. Arega, T. and Tadesse, T., “Household willingness to pay for green electricity in urban and peri-urban Tigray, northern Ethiopia: Determinants and welfare effects”,  Energy Policy, Vol. 100, (2017), 292 - 300. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.022).
87. D. Cook, B. Davíðsdottir and D. M. Kristofersson, “Willingness to pay for the preservation of geothermal areas in Iceland - The contingent valuation studies of Eldvorp and Hverahlíð”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 116, (2018), 97 - 108. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.072).
88. Myung, I. J., “Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 47, (2003), 90 - 100. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7).
89. Kristrom, B., “Spike Models in Contingent Valuation”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 79, No. 3, (1997), 1013-1023. (https://doi:10.2307/1244440).
90. Dutt, D., “Understanding the barriers to the diffusion of rooftop solar: A case study of Delhi (India)”, Energy Policy, Vol. 144, (2020). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111674).
91. Bhati, P. and Kalsotra, R.,  “Solar rooftop: Replacing diesel generators in residential societies”, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, (2017). (http://cdn.cseindia.org/userfiles/Policy-Brief-Solar-Rooftop-Replacing-Diesel-Generators-in-Residential-Societies.pdf).
92. Jareemit, D. and Limmeechokchai, B., “Understanding Resident’s Perception of Energy Saving Habits in Households in Bangkok,” Energy Procedia, (2017), Vol. 138, 247 - 252,. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.048).
93. Sen, V., Joshi, G. and Kunte, M., “Purchasing Energy Efficient Appliances: A Qualitative Investigation Using Text Analysis”, Test Engineering and Management, Vol. 82, (2020), 13230 - 13241. (https://www.testmagzine.biz/index.php/testmagzine/article/view/2958/2595).
94. Berkhout, F., Marcotullio, P. and Hanaoka, T., “Understanding energy transitions”, Sustainable Science, (2012), 109-111. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5).
95. Taber, K. S., “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education”, Research in Science Education, Vol. 48, (2018), 1273-1296. (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2).
96. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S. and Jalaliyoon, N., “Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory”, Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, (2014), 375 - 382. (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02557344/document).
97. Neill, J., “Writing Up A Factor Analysis”, University of Canberra, Canberra, (2008). (https://www.academia.edu/2831918/Writing_up_a_factor_analysis).
98. Chan, K.Y.A., Oerlemans, L.A., Volschenk, J. and Oliver, H., “Objective and Subjective Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity, Do they measure the same? Evidence from South African Case”, in Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Portland, USA., (2011). (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6017886/authors#authors).
99. Onwezen, M.C., Antonides, G. and Bartels, J.,  “The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 39, (2013), 141 - 153. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005).
100. Aizaki, H., Nakatani, T., and Sato, Z., Stated Preference Methods Using R, Taylor and Francis, (2015). (https://doi.org/10.1201/b17292).
101. Kuha, J., “AIC and BIC: Comparisons of assumptions and performance”, Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, (2004), 188 - 229. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103262065).
102. Loomis, J., and Ekstrand, E., “Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, (1998), 29-41. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00126-2).
103. . Donfouet, H. P. P., Jeanty, P. W. and Mahieu, P.-A. “Dealing with internal inconsistency in double-bounded dichotomous choice: An application to community-based health insurance”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 46, (2014), 317 - 328. (10.1007/s00181-012-0665-2).
104. Guo, X., Liu, H., Mao, X., Jin, J., Chen, D., and Cheng, S., “Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China”, Energy Policy, Vol. 68, (2014), 340 - 347. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032).
105. Dagher, L., and Harajli, H., “Willingness to pay for green power in an unreliable electricity sector: Part 1. The case of the Lebanese residential sector”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 50, (2015), 1634 - 1642. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.162).
106. . Lee, C.-Y. and Heo, H., “Estimating willingness to pay for renewable energy in South Korea using the contingent valuation method”, Energy Policy, Vol. 94, (2016), 150-156. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.051).
107. Cheng, Y., Cao, K., Woo, C. and Yatchew, A. , “Residential willingness to pay for deep decarbonization of electricity supply: Contingent valuation evidence from Hong Kong,” Energy Policy, Vol. 109, (2017), 218 - 227. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.006)
108. Oliva, P., Alexianu, M. and Nasir, R., “Suffocating prosperity: Air pollution and economic growth in developing countries”, 05 December 2019. Available: (https://www.theigc.org/publications/suffocating-prosperity-air-pollution-and-economic-growth-developing-countries).
109. Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A. and Garling, T., “Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity”, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 2, (2008), 768 - 774. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.027).
110. Ebeling, F. and Lotz, S., “Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt put tariffs”, Natural climate change letters, Vol. 5, (2015), 868-871. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2681).
111. Gulia, J., Jadhav, A., Garg, V. and Kuiper, D. G., “Financing trends in the rooftop solar commercial and industrial segment (C&I) in India: Scaling up rooftop solar finance in untapped markets”, IEEFA and JMK Research, New Delhi, (2021). (http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Financing-Trends-in-the-Rooftop-Solar-Consumer-and-Industrial-Segment-in-India_September-2021.pdf).
112. Shekhar, J., Suri, D., Somani, P., Lee, S. J. and Arora, M., “Reduced renewable energy stability in India following COVID-19: Insights and key policy recommendations”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 144, (2021). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111015).