Document Type : Research Article


Symbiosis Centre for Management and Human Resources Development, Economics, Pune, India


India seeks to achieve 175 Giga-Watt (GW) of Renewable power by 2022. As of December 2017, out of 333 GW of total installed capacity of electricity, close to 62GW come from renewable sources. Meeting the set targets calls for augmentation of renewable energy based capacities as expeditiously as possible. However, the sick financial health of the distribution companies/utilities, who act as the primary purchasing authorities of such power, is posing as a threat to the success of the renewable industry. This paper highlights that while the cost of procurement of renewable power, to the utilities, has gone down significantly in the recent past; the worsening financial health of utilities remains a key concern. Data is presented to substantiate that the said distribution companies/utilities are saddled by high gaps between Average Cost of Supply (ACS) and Average Revenue Requirement (ARR). Revenues to the power supplying utilities are under-recovered due to the long standing practice of cross- subsidization in the Indian power sector – agricultural and residential consumers of electricity consume power at lower tariffs, than commercial and industrial consumers. A case is therefore suggested for implementing evidence based tariff setting by the utilities. Under the suggested framework, electricity tariffs for different consumer categories can be charged with a premium for green power, based on their willingness to pay for such power. Collected funds, then can be used towards purchase of green power, by the said utilities, and consequently help foster the development of green energy in the country. This study also presents limited empirical evidence, recording the willingness to pay for such premiums, across different categories of “paying” consumers.


1.     Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Olivier, J.G.J., Peters, J.A.H.W. and Schure, K.M., "Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries," Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, (2017).
2.     Olivier, J.G.J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M. and Peters, J.A.H.W., "Trends in Global CO2 Emissions - 2016 Report", PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, (2016).
3.     Ministry of Power. (2017, March) Central Electricity Authority. [Online].
4.     Conservation Action Trust, "Coal kills- Health impact of air polllution from India's coal power expansion", Conservation Action Trust, Mumbai, (2012).
5.     Guttikunda, S. and Jawahar, P., "Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in India", Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 92, (2014), 449-460.
6.     United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2008, March) UNFCCC. [Online].
7.     Government of India. (2008) Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. [Online].
8.     Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F. and Qin, D., "Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2012).
9.     Kumar, A., Kumar, K., Kaushik, N., Sharma, S. and Mishra, S, "Renewable energy in India: Current status and future potentials", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 8, (2010), 2434-2442.
10.   Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. (2010) Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Solar Mission. [Online].
11.   Ministry of Power. (2017, December) Central Electricity Authority.[Online].
12.   Ministry of Finance. (2015-16) Union Budget. [Online].
13.   Central Electricity Regulatory Authority. (2003, May) Central Electricity Regulatory Authority. [Online].
14.   International Renewable Energy Agency. International Renewable Energy Agency. [Online].
15.   Government of India. (2010, January) Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. [Online].
16.   Ministry of Power. (2012, October) Ministry of Power, Government of India. [Online].
18.   Government of India - Ministry of Power. (2015, November) Ministry of Power. [Online].
19.   Beck, F. and Martinot, E., "Renewable Energy Policies and Barriers", Encyclopedia of Energy, Vol. 5, (2004), 365-383.
20.   Press Information Bureau. (2017, October) Press Information Bureau.[Online].
21.   Sara, S. and Lin, A., "Chinese Renewable Energy Law and its impact on renewable power in China: Progress, Challenges and recommendation for improving implementation", Energy Policy, Vol. 51, (2012),  89-109.
22.   Bohringer, C., Nicholas, J., Rivers, T. Rutherford, and R. Wigle, "Green Jobs and Renewable Electricity Policies: Employment Impacts of Ontario's Feed-in-Tariff", The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, (2012), 1-40.
23.   Brian Hill, (2016, December) Global News. [Online].
24.   Busgen, U. and Durrschmidt, W., "The expansion of electricity generation from renewable energies in Germany - A review based on Renewable Energy Sources Act Progress Report 2007 and the new german feed - in legislation", Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 7, (2009) 2536 - 2545.
25.   Sören Amelang, (2015, February) Clean Energy Wire. [Online].
26.   British Petroleum, (2018) BP Global. [Online]. statistical-review-of-world-energy.html.
27.   Joy, J., Joy, D. and Panwar, T.S., "People's Perception Study: Renewable energy in India 2014", WWF-India, (2015).
28.   Thakur, T., Deshmukh, S.G., kaushik, S.C. and Kulshrestha, M., "Impact assessment of the Electricity Act 2003 on the Indian Power Sector", Energy Policy, Vol. 33, No. 9, (2005), 1187-1198.
29.   Government of India, "Powering "One India", Office of Chief Economic Advisor, Delhi, Economic Survey 2016.
30.   Dossani, R. and Ranganathan, V., "Farmers willingness to pay for power in India: Conceptual Issues, Survey results and implication for pricing", Energy Economics, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2004), 359 - 369.
31.   Urpelainen, J. and Yoon, S., "Solar home systems for rural India: Survey evidence on awareness and willingness to pay from Uttar Pradesh," Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 24, (2015), 70 - 78.
32.   Lahiri, D. and Acharjee, G., "Biomass gasifier electricity and study of willingness to pay," International Journal of Renewable Energy Resources, Vol. 3, (2013), 16-18.
33.   Bose, R.K. and Shukla, M., "Electricity tariffs in India: an assessment of consumers' ability and willingness to pay in Gujarat," Energy Policy, Vol. 29, No. 6, (2001), 465-478.
34.   Gill, B., Saluja, S. and Palit, D., "Charging Power: Understanding Electricity Pricing and Willingness to Pay for Electricity in India", The Energy Resources Institute, Delhi, Technical Report (2017).
35.   Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R. and Schuman, H., "Report of the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation", (1993).
36.   Carson, R. and Hanemann, M., Contingent Valuation, 2nd ed., K G Maler and J R Vincent, Eds. USA: Elsevier, 2005.
37.   Whittington, D., "Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries", World Development, Vol. 26, No. 1, (1998), 21-30.
38.   Abdullah, Zhou, D., Shah, T., Jebran, K., Ali, S. and Ali, A., "Acceptance and willingness to pay for solar home system: Survey evidence from northern area of Pakistan", Energy Reports, Vol. 3, (2017), 54 - 60.
39.   Albernini, A., "Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound and BiVariate Models", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, (1995), 287-306.
40.   Hanemann, M., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B., "Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73, No. 4, (1991), 1255-1263.
41.   Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission. (2016, November) MERC India. [Online].